<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2363">
<title>COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND THE SUSTAINABILITY LIKELIHOOD OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2363</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2364"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T10:31:49Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2364">
<title>COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND THE SUSTAINABILITY LIKELIHOOD OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2364</link>
<description>COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND THE SUSTAINABILITY LIKELIHOOD OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA
OBAR, Eucharia Ejowokoghene
Poor inclusion of community members in past development projects negatively impacted their&#13;
sustainability. Hence, Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) harps on social&#13;
inclusion of communities in its projects to reduce conflict, enhance project quality and&#13;
guarantee sustainability. Typology of community involvement in CSDP has been described in&#13;
previous studies. However, empirical evidence on the influence of involvement by generation&#13;
on project sustainability is scarce. Therefore, generational involvement and the Sustainability&#13;
Likelihood (SL) of CSDP in Southwestern Nigeria were investigated.&#13;
A four-stage sampling procedure was used. Oyo and Ekiti states were randomly selected from&#13;
four CSDP participating states in Southwestern Nigeria. Four and five Local Government Areas&#13;
as well as five communities each in Oyo and Ekiti states, respectively, were purposively&#13;
selected based on availability of completed CSDP in the last five years. List of community&#13;
members involved in CSDP was stratified into youths (18-35 years), adults (36-59 years) and&#13;
elders (≥60 years). Using sampling proportionate to size, 70 youths (Male: 36; Female: 34),&#13;
120 adults (Male: 58; Female: 62) and 77 elders (Male: 44; Female: 33) were selected across&#13;
communities in Oyo and Ekiti states to give 267 respondents. Interview schedule was used to&#13;
collect data on respondents’ socio-economic characteristics (age, years of education, hours&#13;
spent during implementation, monthly income), compliance to gender and generational&#13;
inclusion principle, involvement, SL (economic, technical, social and environmental), benefits&#13;
derived from involvement and constraints to involvement in CSDP using standardised scales.&#13;
Indices of compliance (low: 12.00-24.50; moderate: 24.51-31.40; high: 31.41-39.00), economic&#13;
SL (low: 0.50-1.68; high: 1.69-3.00), technical SL (low: 0.29-2.45; high: 2.46-3.07), social SL&#13;
(low: 0.00-2.42; high: 2.43-3.00), environmental SL (low: 0.00-2.52; high: 2.53-3.14) and&#13;
overall SL (low: 8.00-103.40; high: 103.41-132.00) were generated. Data were analysed using&#13;
descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson product moment correlation and logit regression at&#13;
α0.05.&#13;
Age, years of education, hours spent during implementation and monthly income were&#13;
47.32±15.91 years, 11.01±5.42 years, 4.26±3.30 hours/day and N53,430.60±52471.57,&#13;
respectively. Compliance (Proportion-P=62.2%), involvement (P=59.2%), technical SL&#13;
(P=65.9%), social SL (P=69.3%), environmental SL (P=68.2%), and overall SL (P=68.2%) of&#13;
CSDP were high, while economic SL was low (P=54.7%). Benefits derived were enhanced&#13;
interaction (2.25±0.89) and increased relevance of project to community needs (2.25±0.94).&#13;
Constraints to involvement among female were inadequate fund (youth-1.38±0.80; adult-&#13;
1.10±0.80 and elderly-1.03±0.80), while inadequate time-1.47±0.70, lack of incentives-&#13;
1.12±0.80 and inflation-0.95±0.80 were the major constraints among the youths, adults and&#13;
elderly male, respectively. Involvement was significantly higher among the elders (x̄=110.45)&#13;
than adults (x̄=101.42) and youths (x̄=83.64). Benefits derived were significantly higher among&#13;
the elders (x̄=62.55) than adults (x̄=59.18) and youths (x̄=50.66). Years of formal education&#13;
(r=0.18), hours spent during implementation (r=0.15), involvement (r=0.18), benefits derived&#13;
(r=0.14) and compliance (r=0.35) significantly influenced SL of CSDP. Compliance&#13;
significantly influenced SL among female (youth–β=0.52; adult–β=0.40 and elders–β=0.70),&#13;
while involvement of adult male (β=0.42) significantly influenced the SL of CSDP.&#13;
Generational inclusion enhanced the Sustainability Likelihood of Community and Social&#13;
Development Project in Southwestern Nigeria.
</description>
<dc:date>2021-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
