<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1858">
<title>SUITABLE MEASURES OF JUMPS IN STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR STOCK MARKET INDICES</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1858</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1859"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T04:24:00Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1859">
<title>SUITABLE MEASURES OF JUMPS IN STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR STOCK MARKET INDICES</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1859</link>
<description>SUITABLE MEASURES OF JUMPS IN STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR STOCK MARKET INDICES
ADEOSUN, Mabel Eruore
The dynamics of the stock market indices log-returns (∆(lnS~t)) have been characterised by non-normal features such as upward and downward jumps of different&#13;
measures, asymmetric and leptokurtic features. The Bi-Power Variation (BPV)&#13;
process has been used to develop jump-estimators to detect jumps in (∆(lnS~t).&#13;
However, the existing jump-estimators are restricted to the BPV case of the Realised Multi-Power Variation (RMPV) processes, and existing models do not accommodate these features. Therefore, this study was designed to construct unrestricted&#13;
Particular Higher-Order Cases (PHOC) jump-estimators, and build suitable models that can accommodate the jumps and non-normal features found in (∆(lnS~t).&#13;
The limits in probability and distribution were used to derive the Jump Test Models (JTM) in the PHOC of the RMPV processes. The JTM were used to test&#13;
for jumps under the null hypothesis (H0) of no jump in (∆(lnS~t) at a 5% level&#13;
of significance in three stock markets, namely: Nigerian, UK, and Japan. These&#13;
were used to build the dynamics of (∆(lnS~t). The convolution of densities and the&#13;
L´ evy-It^ o decomposition methods were used to derive the Probability Density Functions (PDF) and the L´ evy-Khintchine (LK) formulae of two novel skewed models.&#13;
The maximum likelihood estimation method was used to estimate the optimal values of the parameters in the models. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling&#13;
statistics, and the basic moments were used to test the suitability of these models&#13;
to the empirical stock market data and compared with three existing models viz:&#13;
Black-Scholes (BS), normal and double-exponential jump-diffusion models.&#13;
The JTM derived for the PHOC of the RMPV processes were:&#13;
^ Z&#13;
m = ∆−0:5 µ&#13;
−m&#13;
2=mfXg[r1;:::;rm]&#13;
∆;t&#13;
fXg[2] ∆;t − 1! ’RMP V rmax  1; p^q^2  −1, for m = 2 · · · 10,&#13;
where, fXg[r1;:::;rm]&#13;
∆;t ; fXg[2] ∆;t; ’RMP V ; p^and ^ q are the RMPV, realised variance, asympvtotic variance, estimators of bi-power and quad-power variation, respectively. Jumps&#13;
in ∆(lnS~t) were observed and H0 was rejected. The dynamics of ∆(lnS~t) was derived as: ∆(lnS~t) = (µ− 1 2σ2)∆+σ∆Wt +J(Qu j )∆Ntu +J(Qd j)∆Ntd, where,µ; σ; Wt,&#13;
J(Qu j ); J(Qd j); Ntu and Ntd are respectively drift and volatility parameters, standard&#13;
Brownian motion, upward and downward jump measures with intensities λu j and λd j,&#13;
respectively. The PDF of the Asymmetric-Laplace (AL) and the Modified DoubleRayleigh (MDR) were models derived were: f∆(ln S~t)(x) = (1−λ∆t)&#13;
σp∆t ’ x−(µ− 1 2 σ2)∆t&#13;
σp∆t  +&#13;
∆t pκα2λu j exp 2α1µj+α1σ2∆t&#13;
2  exp  −  x −  µ − 12σ2 ∆t α1 &#13;
Φ&#13;
aµj  + qkα2λd jexp 2α2µj+α2σ2∆t&#13;
2  exp  −  x −  µ − 12σ2 ∆t α2 Φb − µj  &#13;
and&#13;
f∆(ln S~t)x = (1−λ∆t)&#13;
σp∆t ’ x−(µ− 1 2 σ2)∆t&#13;
σp∆t   +  pηexp  θ2−ρ&#13;
#  &#13;
 2θexp  −(µj − θ)2&#13;
#  +θpπ#Φa(µj)−µjpπ#Φa(µj) −qηexp ^  θ^2−ρ^&#13;
#^    #2^exp −(µj − θ^)2&#13;
#^ !+&#13;
θpπ#^Φb(µj) − µjpπ#^Φb(−µj)  ∆t,&#13;
where,&#13;
θ = σju(µd∆t)+µjσ2∆t&#13;
(σju+σ2∆t) , ρ =&#13;
µ2 j σ2∆t&#13;
(σju+σ2∆t), # = 2σ2∆tσju&#13;
(σju+σ2∆t),&#13;
θ^ = σjd(µd∆t)+µjσ2∆t&#13;
(σjd+σ2∆t) , ^ ρ = µ2 j σ2∆t&#13;
(σjd+σ2∆t),&#13;
#^ = 2σ2∆tσjd&#13;
(σjd+σ2∆t), η =&#13;
λu&#13;
j&#13;
(σju)’  x−(µ− 1 2 σ2)∆t&#13;
σp∆t   and ^ η = λd j&#13;
(σjd)’  x−(µ− 1 2 σ2)∆t&#13;
σp∆t  . The derived LK formulae of the novel models were: (u) = iuµ − 1 2σ2u2 −  λu j pkα1&#13;
α1−iu +&#13;
λd&#13;
j qkα2&#13;
α2+iu  eiuµj + λd jqk + λu j pk and (u) = iuµ − 1 2σ2µ2 − pλu j&#13;
σu&#13;
j&#13;
+&#13;
qλd j&#13;
σd&#13;
j&#13;
+  pλu j&#13;
σu&#13;
j&#13;
+&#13;
qλd j&#13;
σd&#13;
j  eiuµj,&#13;
respectively.The optimal values of the parameters: (µd; σ; α1; α2; pk; qk; λu j ; λd j; µj)&#13;
and (µd; σ; σju; σjd; p; qλu j ; λd j; µj) in the models were obtained. The AL and MDR&#13;
were models fit the empirical distributions better than the existing models, having&#13;
the BS model in the worst-case scenario.&#13;
The jump test models of the particular higher-order cases were found to be better&#13;
jump-estimators. The asymmetric-Laplace and modified double-Rayleigh jumpdiffusion models proved more suitable for capturing jumps and non-normal features&#13;
in the stock market indices log-returns.
</description>
<dc:date>2022-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
