<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1664">
<title>QUALITY OF WORK LIFE PROGRAMME AND JOB  ATTITUDES AMONG EMPLOYEES IN SELECTED  ORGANISATIONS IN BENIN CITY, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1664</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1665"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T09:54:30Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1665">
<title>QUALITY OF WORK LIFE PROGRAMME AND JOB  ATTITUDES AMONG EMPLOYEES IN SELECTED  ORGANISATIONS IN BENIN CITY, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1665</link>
<description>QUALITY OF WORK LIFE PROGRAMME AND JOB  ATTITUDES AMONG EMPLOYEES IN SELECTED  ORGANISATIONS IN BENIN CITY, NIGERIA
OLEABHIELE, EGUONOR JENNIFER
Aggressive drive towards increased productivity and profit maximisation often &#13;
compromise employees‟ welfare, satisfaction and commitment. Quality of work life &#13;
programme (QWLFP) such as occupational health and safety (OHS), training and skill &#13;
development (TSD), teamwork, employee involvement (EI), employee recognition (ER), &#13;
flexible working hour (FWH), long service award (LSA) health care and wellness (HCW), &#13;
and child educational benefit (CEB) can promote employees‟ job attitudes, while &#13;
enhancing organisational performance. Previous studies on QWLFP focused more on &#13;
reducing counter-productive behaviours than the enhancement of employee job attitudes &#13;
(Job satisfaction and Organisational commitment). This study, was, therefore, designed to &#13;
examine employees‟ benefit from QWLFP, factors that influence benefit from QWLFP, &#13;
Satisfaction with QWLFP (SQWLFP), Employees‟ Job Satisfaction (JS) and &#13;
Organisational Commitment (OC), QWLFP influence on employees‟ JS and OC and &#13;
challenges with QWLFP implementation.&#13;
Expectancy and Social Exchange theories provided the framework, while cross-sectional &#13;
survey design was adopted. The Nigerian Petroleum Development Company Limited &#13;
(NPDC) and Nigerian Bottling Company Limited (NBC) were purposively selected due to &#13;
their implementation of QWLFP. A sample size of 536 (NPDC; 274 and NBC; 262) was &#13;
selected using Yamane‟s (1976) formula. Respondents were systematically and randomly &#13;
sampled from departments. A semi-structured questionnaire elicited information on socio demographic characteristics, benefit from QWLFP, factors influencing benefit from &#13;
QWLFP, SQWLFP, JS, OC, QWLFP influence on employees‟ JS and OC and challenges &#13;
encountered. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with employees (13) and Trade &#13;
Union officials (3) and three key informant interviews were conducted on Human &#13;
Resource Managers. The SQWLFP, JS and OC were respectively measured as low &#13;
≤49.9% or high ≥50%. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential &#13;
statistics at p ≥ 0.05, while qualitative data were content analysed. &#13;
Respondents‟ age was 35 ± 2.3 years; males constituted 72.2%; those with tertiary &#13;
education had 86.8% and those who earned above N170,000 monthly ( 31.7%). &#13;
Respondents in NPDC (86%) and NBC (74.6%) benefited from teamwork, OHS, TSD, EI, &#13;
FWH, HCW and CEB. Employees‟ benefit from QWLFP was influenced by age &#13;
(β=8.164), employment status (β=5.464), sex (β=3.854) and staff cadre (β=3.535) in &#13;
NPDC and highest educational qualification (β=63.521), income (β=53.558), employment &#13;
status (β=48.300) and age (β=19.343) in NBC. Employees in NPDC (89.1%) and NBC &#13;
(57.6%) were satisfied with QWLFP. In NPDC, employees‟ JS (88.3%) and OC (88.7%) &#13;
were high; in NBC, JS (40.8%) and OC (40.5%) were low. There was a positive influence &#13;
of QWLFP on employees‟ JS and OC. Specifically, QWLFP significantly influenced &#13;
employees‟ JS; EI [β= 6.043], ER [β=4.560] and LSA [β=3.398] in NPDCand JS; ER &#13;
[β=15.480], LSA [β=13.314] and FWH [13.925] in NBC. Also, QWLFP significantly &#13;
influenced employees‟ OC in NPDC; EI [β=4.121], HCW [β=5.005], and in NBC; ER &#13;
[β=16.239], LSA [β=14.340] and FWH [β=13.007]. Challenges encountered in the &#13;
implementation of QWLFP included inadequate technological infrastructure, lack of &#13;
resilience in the pursuit of QWLFP by trade unions, cost considerations and poor &#13;
Management attitude.&#13;
Quality of work life programme leads to positive job attitudes. Organisations should &#13;
overcome managerial challenges and increase efforts towards implementing the &#13;
programme to improve employees‟ job attitudes
</description>
<dc:date>2021-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
