<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>EVALUATION OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAMME IN GOVERNMENT-OWNED PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2004" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2004</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T17:02:06Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T17:02:06Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>EVALUATION OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAMME IN GOVERNMENT-OWNED PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2005" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>OLUDARE, Bosede Abiola</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2005</id>
<updated>2024-04-25T07:33:21Z</updated>
<published>2023-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">EVALUATION OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAMME IN GOVERNMENT-OWNED PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA
OLUDARE, Bosede Abiola
The English Language Teacher Preparation Programme (ELTPP) at Faculties of Education (FoE)&#13;
in universities aims to produce quality English Language Teachers (ELTs) for senior secondary&#13;
level. However, this objective is hardly met as many graduates of FoEs in public universities in&#13;
southwestern Nigeria perform below expectation in their various places of works. Previous studies&#13;
have concentrated more on interventions to improve the quality of ELTPP than on evaluation of&#13;
ELTPP in universities. Therefore, this study was carried out to evaluate Pre-service English&#13;
Language Teacher Preparation Programme (ELTPP) in public universities in southwestern&#13;
Nigeria, with a view to determining its strength and weaknesses.&#13;
The framework was provided by Kelly’s Theory and ATO Evaluation Model, while the mixed&#13;
methods design was adopted .The multistage sampling procedure was used. Three(3) states (Ekiti,&#13;
Osun, Lagos) containing both federal and state universities were purposively selected. Six (three&#13;
federal, three state) public universities running programmes in ELTPP were purposively selected.&#13;
The purposive sampling technique was used to select 360 final year English Language students&#13;
who were in 400 level (60 from each university). Thirty lecturers of ELTPP(5 per university) were&#13;
randomly selected. The instruments used were Lecturers’ Perception of ELTPP(r=0.75), Students’&#13;
Perception of ELTPP(r=0.76) questionnaires, Inventory of Availability of Human Resources for&#13;
ELTPP (r=0.78), Teaching Methods of ELLs (r=0.89) and Classroom Teaching Observation&#13;
Schedule (r=0.81). Two sessions of focuse group discussion were held with principals and Heads&#13;
of Department of English Language in their schools of practice. The quantitative data were&#13;
analysed using descriptive statistics, while the qualitative data were content-analysed.&#13;
The majority (93.0%) of the lecturers had Ph.D degree, and 52.8% had 11-20 years teaching&#13;
experience. The admission requirements and the profile of lecturers conformed with the National&#13;
University Commission Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards (NUC, BMAS). The&#13;
prescribed material resources were not sufficient (&#119909;̅ =1.49) and human resources were inadequate&#13;
(&#119909;̅=1.38), against the threshold of (1.50). Lecturers had a positive perception of the programme&#13;
(&#119909;̅= 3.0), against 2.50 threshold. Students had a good perception of the preparation programe(&#119909;̅=&#13;
2.80) and the objectives of the preparation programme were relevant and adequate (&#119909;̅=4.00) against&#13;
the threshold of 2.50. The teaching methods (&#119909;̅=3.02),lesson preparation(&#119909;̅=3.19),&#13;
delivery(&#119909;̅=3.04), assessment practices(&#119909;̅=2.87), content knowledge(&#119909;̅=3.04), classroom&#13;
management(&#119909;̅=3.06) and communication skills(&#119909;̅=3.00) of the respondents were good, against&#13;
the threshold of 2.50. Many of them had high content knowledge of English Language.The&#13;
principals and head teachers agreed that the human and material resources were not sufficient,&#13;
however, communication skills, preparation of lesson note and delivery and classroom&#13;
management were good.&#13;
The pre-service English Language teacher preparation programme in public universities in&#13;
Southwestern Nigeria was good. High content knowledge, communication skills, good classroom&#13;
management, good lesson preparation and lesson delivery of graduates were the strengths of the&#13;
programme, while inadequate human and material resources were their deficiencies. These&#13;
deficiencies should be addressed by faculties of education.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
