<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>AGRICULTURAL POTENTIALS OF SOILS DERIVED FROM SELECTED PARENT MATERIALS ON THE JOS PLATEAU, NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1894" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1894</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T10:35:15Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T10:35:15Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>AGRICULTURAL POTENTIALS OF SOILS DERIVED FROM SELECTED PARENT MATERIALS ON THE JOS PLATEAU, NIGERIA</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1895" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>AKINWA, Andrew Olabanji</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1895</id>
<updated>2024-04-24T07:22:08Z</updated>
<published>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">AGRICULTURAL POTENTIALS OF SOILS DERIVED FROM SELECTED PARENT MATERIALS ON THE JOS PLATEAU, NIGERIA
AKINWA, Andrew Olabanji
The agricultural potentials of soils depend on their properties which are usually influenced&#13;
by the Parent Materials (PMs). An understanding of the properties of soils from different&#13;
PMs is required for effective management and utilisation. Despite the high agricultural&#13;
prospects of the semi temperate climate of the Jos Plateau, limited information is available&#13;
on the effects of the PMs on the agricultural potentials of the soils. This study was, therefore,&#13;
conducted to characterise, classify and assess the agricultural potentials of soils resulting&#13;
from three major PMs (Basalt, Granite and Unconsolidated deposits [UD]) on the Plateau.&#13;
A reconnaissance survey of the Jos Plateau was conducted to identify soils from the three&#13;
PMs. One profile pit each was sunk and described at the crest, upper slope, middle slope,&#13;
lower slope and valley bottom positions on two toposequences of soils formed on each PM,&#13;
using standard methods. Randomised complete block design was used with three PMs as&#13;
treatments replicated twice. Parent materials and soil samples were collected, assessed for&#13;
morphological characteristics and analysed for physical and chemical properties, following&#13;
standard procedures. These properties were used to classify the soils using USDA and&#13;
FAO/World Reference Base systems while their agricultural potentials were assessed using&#13;
Land Capability (LC) and Fertility Capability (FC) evaluation systems. Land capability was&#13;
rated classes I (soils with few limitations), II (some limitations), III (severe limitations), IV&#13;
(very severe limitations), V (limitations other than erosion hazards), VI (extreme&#13;
limitations), VII (use restricted to grazing) and VIII (unsuitable). Fertility Capability was&#13;
rated on specific constraints to soil fertility; the less the constraints, the better the soil. Data&#13;
were analysed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA at 0.05.&#13;
Basalt was fine grained, Granite and rock remnants of UD were coarse grained and their&#13;
soils differed significantly in properties. Soils were red, strong brown and yellowish brown&#13;
in colour on Basalt, Granite and UD PMs, respectively. The soils were well drained in the&#13;
upper and middle slope positions and imperfectly or poorly drained in the lower slope and&#13;
valley bottom positions. Total nitrogen was 1.32±0.75 g/kg, 1.47±0.82 g/kg and 1.08±0.62&#13;
g/kg for soils derived from Basalt, Granite and UD, respectively. Exchangeable potassium&#13;
was significantly higher (0.63±0.38 cmol/kg) for the soils from Granite than those from&#13;
Basalt (0.41±0.38 cmol/kg) and UD (0.37±0.34 cmol/kg). Effective cation exchange&#13;
capacity was 10.78±6.2 cmol/kg, 15.24±3.6 cmol/kg and 15.48±2.88 cmol/kg for the soils&#13;
from Basalt, Granite and UD, respectively. The soils from Basalt and Granite were classified&#13;
as Inceptisols (Cambisols) and Alfisols (Lixisols); those from UD were Alfisols (Lixisols).&#13;
In LC classification, class II land was 50%, 40% and 30% on Basalt, UD and Granite,&#13;
respectively. Soils from UD had the least constraints to fertility (three), Basalt (four) and&#13;
Granite (six), in FC classification.&#13;
The soils of the Jos Plateau investigated were mainly Inceptisols (Cambisols) and Alfisols&#13;
(Lixisols). Basalt and Unconsolidated deposits derived soils with minimal constraints had&#13;
higher agricultural potentials than those from Granite and could support sustainable&#13;
agricultural production with good management.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
